WEF Discussions — Now on LinkedIn!

WEF is pleased to announce the creation of free LinkedIn groups associated with its technical discussion forum topics. Through these LinkedIn groups, members will be able to view and participate in discussions, as well as communicate with one another via direct messages. Share your experiences and knowledge, ask questions and respond to other discussions as frequently as you like!

You must have a LinkedIn profile to join a LinkedIn group; you can create your profile here. If you already have a LinkedIn profile, all you need to do is submit a request to join one or all of the following groups:

Water Environment Federation (Main) | Biosolids | Collection Systems | Nutrients | Stormwater 
Utility Management | Water Reuse | Water for Jobs | Watershed Management | Laboratory Practices 

RSS Feed Print
DO interference
James Royer
Posted: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:50 AM
Joined: 9/21/2009
Posts: 98


I would like to point out a potential problem for the BOD analysis and DO values if the wastewater plant is dechlorinating with sulfite. We recently had to start monitoring the effluent for DO. We chlorinate and dechlorinate with sodium bisulfite. A comparison of DO on the effluent indicates low values with the Winkler method as compared with the Hach LDO.

 

The Hach LDO reads right at saturation at temperature and with considerable mixing that should be the correct DO. The Winkler reads about 1.5 mg/L lower. There is a sulfite residual that would account for this. Standard Methods indicates that reducing agent will give low values with the iodimetric methods.

 

Thus if the Winkler method is used for BOD analysis then the initial DO would read low and the BOD of the sample would be calculated low. I know most analysts use the probe method so it would not be a problem. In the past if there was a question about DO results we deferred to the Winkler but maybe we should be selective about DO interferences and methods.