<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <!-- Generated by Ektron CMS400.NET -->
 <channel>
  <title>WEF Discussion Forums : Operation and Maintenance</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=topics&amp;f=548&amp;groupid=-1</link>
  <description>Troubleshooting, Plant Maintenance, and General Operations</description>
 <item>
  <title>Water Fleas!!!(2)</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935278</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 238 Views<br />Started by 01474775<br />Last Posted to on Wednesday, May 08, 2013 10:41:31 AM by 01474775<br />Does anyone have problems with these little pests!  If so, what do you do to get rid of them?  <br />
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:41:31 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Ferric Flow Meters? Is it a good idea?(2)</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935265</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 1000 Views<br />Started by 01780074<br />Last Posted to on Sunday, April 14, 2013 7:02:09 PM by 17633991<br /><p>Ferric Chloride has the unique ability of ruining everything it touches. My mind runs to an external pipe solution such as an ultrasonic meter.  I like Endress Hauser for that sort of thing but there are plenty of good ones on the market.  </p>
<p>Regards, </p>
<p>Pat Frano</p>
<p>Blue Sphere Water Technology</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 00:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Ozone for Fecal Coliform Reduction</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935268</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 274 Views<br />Started by 17633991<br />Last Posted to on Sunday, April 14, 2013 6:36:15 PM by 17633991<br /><p><span>I am working the sale of an ozone system to replace chlorine/dechlor
chemistry for a small sanitary treatment plant on an NPDES permit.</span><span>  </span><span>Am wondering if anyone knows of a facility in
North Carolina that has done a similar project using ozone for Fecal Coliform
reduction?</span><span>  </span><span>Would like to reference their
permit number as an existing case to speed our modification to my clients
permit through DEQ. Thanks for any help you can provide.</span> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 23:36:15 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Ocean Outfall assessment</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935247</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 1564 Views<br />Started by 01607899<br />Last Posted to on Wednesday, January 09, 2013 3:51:11 PM by 01607899<br /><p>We are interested in learning of methods used by agencies to assess ocean outfalls.  Of particular interest is internal inspection, structural assessment and the estimation of remaining service life.  Our outfall of concern ranges from 48-inch to 72-inch in diameter, extends 8,700 feet into the Pacific Ocean, to a depth of 160 feet. Outfall age is roughly 50 years. External assessments are completed regularly with divers (in shallow depths) and ROVs (deeper). There is a group of agencies in California that would like to learn from the experiences in other parts of the country and beyond.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:51:11 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>pH of Mixed Liquor</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935242</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 1674 Views<br />Started by 17627563<br />Last Posted to on Monday, December 31, 2012 11:10:05 AM by 17627563<br /><p>We're having problems with nitrification in an enclosed HPOX aeration unit with surface aerators. The pH is probably borderline at 6.2-6.3. It is probably depressed by CO2 buildup in the headspace of the UNOX. My research indicates we would get minimal nitrification at that pH. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'd like to know what normal pH is in mixed liquor from other types of aeration processes. Please tell me your pH and type of aeration.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:10:05 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Oxidation ditch</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935237</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 2107 Views<br />Started by 01645290<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:24:01 AM by 01645290<br />Does anyone have any experience having to replace a motor on a oxidation ditch that can not be taken off line at this time. The bearings in the motor are bad. Our ditches are elevated, so I will need a fairly large crane. Any experience with how long the whole procedure takes?
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:24:01 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>flow meter calibration - Requires reporting to the regulators?</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935229</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 2462 Views<br />Started by 01782191<br />Last Posted to on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:35:32 PM by 01782191<br /><p>Our NPDES permit requires that we continuously monitor the flow rate of our treatment plant's influent and effluent wastestreams.   The NPDES standard conditions states that we need to calibrate our meters every six months or more often if required by the manufacturer.  Do anyone of you have similar provisions in your permits and if so, how do you folks address them. I've heard some facilities have redundant flow meters so technically they are always monitoring the folow. If you don't have redundant meters, do you notify your regulatory agencies when the meters are taking offline to conduct the calibration?  how is the situation handled? </p>
<p>Aloha.</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:35:32 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>flow meter calibration - that is requires reporting to the regulators?</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935228</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 1364 Views<br />Started by 01782191<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 9:55:23 PM by 01782191<br /><p>In Hawaii, we have an NPDES Permit Standard Condition issued by our State Department of Health that requires periodic calibration (6 months interval or more if required by the manufacturer).  Our NPDES permit requires the monitoring of the treatment plant's influent and effluent flow continuously.  </p>
<p></p>
<p>During a recent calibration event, it took the techs longer to perform the work than usual.  Do you folks have a similar language in your permit that requires continuous flow monitoring and if so, how do you folks handle the situation when a calibration is performed. Do you folks submit a notice to the regulatory agency when an interruption is performed for the calibration and if its longer than usual do you folks submit a noncompliance?  Do you folks have redundant flow meter to meet the continuous flow provision of your permit?</p>
<p></p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 02:55:23 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Determining the settlement tank&#39;s volume</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935223</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 2771 Views<br />Started by Hajar<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:55:37 PM by Hajar<br /><p>Hello All,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I am a student and in my project I need to be able to estimate size (at list area) of the primary settlement tank of which I know the flow rate per day (around 330 ML/d), and the actual retention time is less than 20 min. I am not an engineer (I study environmental management with chemistry background), and wonder if I could find any relationship between the flow rate and tank size if the retention time of 2 h is desired.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thank you very much in advance,</p>
<p>Hajar </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>WWTP Opportunity - City of Kuna, ID</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935211</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 2688 Views<br />Started by DPFG<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:17:02 PM by DPFG<br /><p> </p>
<p> <span>The City of Kuna, Idaho hereby announces that sealed proposals will be received for the PURCHASE, LEASE, MANAGEMENT, OPERATION AND/OR OTHER MUTUALLY AGREEABLE TRANSACTION involving the 3.5 million gallon per day Kuna North Waste Water Treatment Plant.<span>  </span></span> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span>Proposals will be received until 4:00 pm on October 2, 2012, Mountain Daylight Time. Proposals received after the due date and time will not be considered and no proposer may withdraw their proposal after the time set for the opening.</span> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span>Specifications and instructions for submission of proposals are available as of August 29, 2012 at </span><a href="http://www.dpfg.com/kuna/"><span><font color="#800080">http://www.dpfg.com/kuna/</font></span></a><font face="Calibri"> </font><span> or by email from Matthew Look at </span><a href="mailto:matthew.look@dpfg.com"><span>matthew.look@dpfg.com</span></a><span> or contact directly at 602-381-3226 ext. 15.<span>  </span>Copies of the Request for Proposals may also be obtained from the Kuna City Clerk located at 763 West Avalon, Kuna, Idaho.</span> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span>The Kuna City Council reserves the right to disregard all non-conforming, non-responsive or conditional proposals, to waive any minor informality, to reject all proposals or to accept the proposal it deems best.</span> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 17:17:02 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Isopropanol issues</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935204</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 3068 Views<br />Started by 01797999<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, August 28, 2012 2:38:40 PM by 01725626<br />Why can't they use air stripping/scrubbing or salt addition? These are the result of a quick online search. Maybe they aren't being up front with you. It is the industry's responsibility to reduce their discharge to 200 mg/l, not yours to figure it out for them.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:38:40 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>ski resort WWTP operation</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935189</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 362 Views<br />Started by 01463964<br />Last Posted to on Friday, August 10, 2012 2:24:42 PM by 01463964<br /><p>I am starting up an Orenco unit at a small ski resort. Thinking of feeding the system ahead of time to get the bugs going prior to January. Any suggestions.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I also have to deal with cold process temps.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:24:42 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Request for info regarding Trojan UV systems</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8976</link>
  <description><![CDATA[5 Replies, 7983 Views<br />Started by T.O.C.<br />Last Posted to on Friday, August 10, 2012 2:22:01 PM by 01463964<br /><p>complicated and costly. If you have a good I.T. guy to keep all the bell and whistles going it has the potential of working well.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:22:01 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>We have a terrible foaming problem in our aerobic digesters</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589934995</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 853 Views<br />Started by DarylP<br />Last Posted to on Friday, August 10, 2012 2:18:56 PM by 01463964<br />Do you have filamentous bacteria your process?
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:18:56 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Overheating wires with WEDECO UV system</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935186</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 343 Views<br />Started by 01453718<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, August 07, 2012 2:46:36 PM by 17633991<br /><p>Charlie,</p>
<p>Are you speaking of the wires in the conduit supplying voltage to the UV system from the control panel?  Have you taken and amp reading under load and verified the wire gauge is correct for the voltage?    </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 19:46:36 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Filiment Problem (O21N)  Can&#39;t pinpoint the cause...Help.</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589934905</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 689 Views<br />Started by Daniel Knox<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:52:21 AM by Daniel Knox<br />We have had to Chlorinate our RAS quite a bit more than past years to keep this filiment at bay.  I know its caused by volitile acids.  We have looked into things like Centrate conc., septage, storm seperation.  Anyone have problems with this filiment, and what was the cause. I'm using up my Cl2 budget in a hurry.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:52:21 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Using Mag Hydroxide</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451816</link>
  <description><![CDATA[3 Replies, 2274 Views<br />Started by Andres Vinent<br />Last Posted to on Monday, June 25, 2012 1:17:21 PM by Handsome Dan<br />We use Mag for Ph/alk adjustment.  It works pretty well for us.  We typically like to run a PH of 6.7-7.0 and alkalinity of 70-90.  works well for alk but not great for PH adjustment.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:17:21 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>High DO in Lagoons</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451415</link>
  <description><![CDATA[2 Replies, 3278 Views<br />Started by Kit Roush<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, June 19, 2012 12:38:49 PM by JDBonner<br /><p>Hi,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Typically when I have seen supersaturated DO readings in a facultative lagoon it has been during times of low rainfall and high temperatures.  What you are probably seeing is lagoon turnover.  I can't remember the exact process but it is due to the carbon dioxide being stripped off the upper layer of water.  I would assume they took the DO reading sometime around midday.  Another way to test this is to check the pH when you get a high DO reading.  If the pH is also high this is a typical sign of turnover.  Also this is a natural occurance.  The only thing I know is to change the time of sample collection to early morning to late evening.</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:38:49 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>salinity in activated sludge</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=10847</link>
  <description><![CDATA[2 Replies, 4461 Views<br />Started by Greg Gress<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, June 14, 2012 5:21:58 AM by Greg Gress<br /><p>We operate a collection system and wwtp on a island and are concerned about the salt water intrusion. We would like to know, perforable with out actually experiencing it, at what level of salinity is too much and will affect our effluent water quality. We have a few properties on the beach that are suspect of saltwater intrusion at high tide. As beach erosion creeps inland, other properties become suspects as well. So at what ppt salinity do we set as the cut off?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Greg  </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:21:58 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Log Sheet Data</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589934675</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 1021 Views<br />Started by Rock<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, June 12, 2012 1:37:26 PM by 01654120<br />I agree with you, Rock.  A zero is a zero which is a value.  A line or N/A is best.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:37:26 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>FOG Causing Primary Clarifier Failures(5)</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589934595</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 1127 Views<br />Started by Erwin Bonatz<br />Last Posted to on Sunday, May 20, 2012 11:25:26 AM by Thomas Eckhoff<br />Do you have an Industrial Pretreatment Program or a grease management program for the restuarants in your district? Larger WTPs typically have programs of this sort to manage this before it gets to the treatment plant.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 16:25:26 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>FOG Causing Primary Clarifier Failures(4)</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589934594</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 579 Views<br />Started by Erwin Bonatz<br />Last Posted to on Monday, May 14, 2012 10:44:24 AM by Erwin Bonatz<br />Heavy FOG in influent is causing my primary clarifiers to fail.  Does anyone have any experience with similar p[roblems?
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:44:24 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>FOG Causing Primary Clarifier Failures(2)</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589934592</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 580 Views<br />Started by Erwin Bonatz<br />Last Posted to on Monday, May 14, 2012 10:38:15 AM by Erwin Bonatz<br />I get FOG coming in with the influent that is so thick and heavy my operations folks have to spend 8 to 12 hours a day manually skimming it off of the primary clarifiers influent channels and effluent skiimers or else the floating grease in the clarifiers gets so thick that it makes the collector flights drive chain jump it's guide sprockets causing a massive failure.  Has anyone else encountered a similar problem and how did you deal with it?
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Wastewater Blog</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6508</link>
  <description><![CDATA[5 Replies, 9673 Views<br />Started by Grant Weaver<br />Last Posted to on Monday, May 07, 2012 4:15:51 AM by will<br /><p>Hi guys, just arrived.</p>
<p> <br />I would like to hear about your feedback and how I can improve it. </p>
<p> <br />My Blog: <span id="cphMain_cphMainArea_Forum1">&lt;a href="http://www.wastewatersystem.net/"&gt;Wastewater Design and Technology&lt;/a&gt;</span></p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 09:15:51 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Operations help</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451246</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 3574 Views<br />Started by Victoria Caulfield<br />Last Posted to on Friday, May 04, 2012 11:10:44 AM by Erwin Bonatz<br /><p>I manage a large treatment plant in Virginia Beach VA.  This plant has a large service area, very concentrated household and resaurant/hotel waste, and a very long travel time up to 3 days to get to the plant.  All flow is conveyed via force mains.  From Mid April through November we have a problem with very thick floating sceptic greasey scum in our primary clarifiers; that if not continuously manually skimmed, will cover the clarifier and completely overwhelm the scum collection system and cause the solids collection flights/chain to jump its guide sprockets and derail in the clarifier.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I am trying to contact other plants that might have this same problem and hopefully learn a few successful ways to either prevent this from happening or actually remove the greasey scum automatically without a lot of manual labor.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Erwin E. Bonatz Jr. P.E.</p>
<p>HRSD Atlantic Treatment Plant Manager</p>
<p>757 821 7402</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 16:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Alkalinity control</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451698</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 2585 Views<br />Started by Andres Vinent<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:51:51 PM by Andres Vinent<br />I'm looking for some feed back on which is the preferred chemical to utilize for adjusting alkalinity in a facility that is required to nitrify.  We are currently using hydrated lime and wish to switch to another product that is more user friendly.  Considering mag hydroxide or caustic.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:51:51 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Energy-Water Nexus and Pumps(2)</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451644</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 2149 Views<br />Started by KVertovec<br />Last Posted to on Friday, February 17, 2012 3:16:23 PM by KVertovec<br /><p>Hi,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm looking for specific measurements and/or statistics about how much energy pumps generate. Hoping someone here can help!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I know that 20 percent of the world's energy is generated from pumps that heat, cool, or move water. What I want to know is what is the measurement of the total energy that this 20 percent comes from? What unit of measurement do I use to analyze this?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thank you for your help!</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:16:23 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Energy-Water Nexus and Pumps</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451643</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 1823 Views<br />Started by KVertovec<br />Last Posted to on Friday, February 17, 2012 3:12:13 PM by KVertovec<br /><p>I'm looking for some specific measurements / statics about how much energy pumps generate. Can anyone help?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I know that 20 percent of the world's energy is generated from pumps that heat, cool, and move water. I'm trying to understand what is the measurement (in units) of the total energy that this 20 percent comes from? What sort of units do I use to measure this?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks for your help!</p>
<br />
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:12:13 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Affordable trash removal from biosolids</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451566</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 2740 Views<br />Started by Landbiosolid<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, February 09, 2012 10:13:41 AM by Landbiosolid<br /><p>Does anyone know of an affordable trash removal system for getting all the trash out of land applied liquid biosoilds?  I already know about the Muffin Monster, but that is an expensive piece of equipment for a ranch to use.  Any help is appreciated.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:13:41 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>RAS lines and clarifier balancing</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451374</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 3097 Views<br />Started by R Siddens<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, February 02, 2012 5:17:05 AM by TerryF<br /><p>You could have seperate pumps etc but it is common practice to bring it the two together with only one set of pumps.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I am sure at times some inbalance exists but it generally works out okay.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>regards</p>
<p>TerryF</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:17:05 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Septage/Grease Screening Units</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451310</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 3262 Views<br />Started by Frederick Auermuller<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, January 03, 2012 3:51:49 PM by Frederick Auermuller<br />Our facility receives between 0.7 and 1.0 million gallons per month of combined domestic septage, grey water, and grease trap waste trucked by tankers to the plant. We have two screening devices from two different manufacturers that receive, screen, and dewater the screened material prior to introduction into the main plant influent stream for treatment. The screening devices have some difficulty dealing with the rocks, sand, rag material, small metal objects, and clogging from heavy grease loads. Is anyone having really good success with a screening device that handles all of these materials? I would appreciate you sharing your equipment success experience.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:51:49 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>buried natural gas piping condition assessment</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451215</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 3562 Views<br />Started by T. Butler<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, December 13, 2011 12:08:44 PM by GSain<br />If you can't get any other help, try going through NACE, <a href="http://www.nace.org">www.nace.org</a> .  They are the organization where you could get contacts on monitoring/identifying corrosion including natural gas piping.  I noticed their home page has a link to inspectors.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:08:44 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>envirofilt</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451213</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 3360 Views<br />Started by JK<br />Last Posted to on Sunday, December 11, 2011 6:52:52 PM by JK<br />Any ideas on what envirofilt is. It was specified as top 18" of polishing filter designed in 1970s.  i believe it to be either anthacite or activated carbon
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:52:52 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Dam Odours</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451014</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 3776 Views<br />Started by Nick<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, November 29, 2011 7:24:44 PM by Nick<br /><p>Hi All,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm interested in some feedback on whether anyone recommends any dam odour specialists (Australia only please) or mechanisms for reducing odour associated with large evaporation dams. Additionally if you have had similar experiences below and can provide feedback on whether you found a practical solution please comment. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>By it's nature the dam is used for evaporating water, and given the waters high hydrocarbon concentrations it naturally volatilises some of these compounds leading to a distinctive odour and hence nuisances to people external to the operations. We have introduced a number of methods to reduce the hydrocarbon loading, some of which exploit simple weirs and cyclones, periodic skimming of the dams to remove lighter fractions accumulating on the surface. In addition to this we treat the water thru a wastewater treatment plant to reduce overall organic loading. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>There is definitely an improvement in water quality however an odour is still present (and I know always will be), but I'm interested in whether anyone has any recommendations from past experiences or can recommend a specialist who is familiar with managing odours from organic dams.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>thanks </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 01:24:44 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Mercury Control</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451008</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 3421 Views<br />Started by Jason Graham<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, November 29, 2011 2:09:00 PM by 17627563<br /><p>I was an industrial waste engineer for City of Toronto. We did a joint study on dental practices with Environment Canada. There are 2000 dentists in the City. We amended the City by-law to demand that all dentists install and maintain amalgam traps. The month after the deadline was imposed there was 40-80% reduction in influent mercury at 4 Toronto STPs. The remainder is probably legacy mercury from dental and other uses sitting in sewers - with specific gravity of 11-12 it doesn't like to move in sewer systems. Piles of amalgam can be seen in dental plumbing systems if no amalgam trap is in place.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Plumbing and maintenance of the traps are key issues; You just can't buy a trap and install it willy-nilly or fail to maintain it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In my opinion 90%+ of all mercury entering an STP may be from dentists.</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Anaerobic sludge digestion Magnesium hyroxide slug</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=7383</link>
  <description><![CDATA[2 Replies, 9103 Views<br />Started by mack72<br />Last Posted to on Saturday, November 26, 2011 10:20:54 AM by Joseph Benson<br /><p>Hi Mack:</p>
<p>Just a word of caution. Magnesium is the limiting nutrient in the formation of struvite. </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:20:54 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>ORP control</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8328</link>
  <description><![CDATA[2 Replies, 7898 Views<br />Started by Mark Milne<br />Last Posted to on Friday, November 25, 2011 1:57:42 AM by D.Mak<br /><p>Strantrol 690 with HRR excellent make sure you have self clean otherwise you have to lift the probe and do it manually. Saves alot in Cl2 depending on the amount used presently, great for checking how well your Oxidizing in the Aeration Tank. Set point 450 mv.</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:57:42 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Polyethylene Glycol Treatability</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6373</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 9380 Views<br />Started by Keith Chapman<br />Last Posted to on Friday, November 25, 2011 1:56:44 AM by Anonymous<br /><root><p>I would suggest you contact your local university that has an civil/environmental engineering laboratory.  Most should be able to perform a sludge degradability test that will indicate the toxicity of this chemical, which will tell you how slow to bleed it into the system.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As far as Anaerobic - this should be perfect for treating glycol.  Anaerobic treatment is best at treating high concentrations of waste but may not completely remove all COD/BOD and the sidestreams will likely be more potent, so be sure the aerobic system can tolerate this.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The large influx of high strength, low solids waste will be greatly beneficial for gas production without impacting solids handling.</p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:56:44 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Digester Piping Phosphate Scaling Inspection.</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442450997</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 2832 Views<br />Started by Nash<br />Last Posted to on Wednesday, November 23, 2011 7:48:00 AM by Nash<br /><p>We are taking CCTV route to inspect the extent of phosphate scaling in digester piping. The piping is insulated. Any experiences/suggestions with CCTV inspection for pressure piping or alternative inspection methods will be helpful.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Digester Gas Piping</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6746</link>
  <description><![CDATA[6 Replies, 11072 Views<br />Started by GB Gehrke<br />Last Posted to on Wednesday, November 23, 2011 7:45:00 AM by Nash<br /><p>We are going CCTV route to inspect extent of phosphate scaling in digester piping. The piping is insulated. Any experiences/suggestions with CCTV inspection for pressure piping or alternative inspection methods will be helpful.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>VFD control of Mamoth Rotors in Oxidation Ditch</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=10836</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 3788 Views<br />Started by Greg Gress<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, November 22, 2011 3:30:13 PM by Tom Hons<br />What is the eyeopener you refer to?   This mainly domestic wwtp has 2 fixed speed rotors, w/out reliable DO monitoring, so I'm curious what we'd see if there was.  I set one rotor to be off from 11pm to 6am, when loading is low, but it's a guess.  Can't you set scada with a specific DO target and let the rotors speed vary to achieve that?
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:30:13 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Wastewater Microbiology/Biology Workshop</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=10435</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 5445 Views<br />Started by Victor Santa Cruz<br />Last Posted to on Sunday, November 13, 2011 11:03:55 PM by Victor Santa Cruz<br /><root><p> The San Francisco Bay and Santa Clara Valley Sections of CWEA are sponsoring a 2 day Wastewater Microbiology/Biology Workshop on July 28-29,2011.  If interested in attending view the workshop flyer (PDF) at:</p><p><br /></p><p>http://www.cwea.org/sfb/flyers/2011/Lab_2011_07.pdf</p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 05:03:55 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Chlorine survival in activated sludge</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6404</link>
  <description><![CDATA[6 Replies, 11018 Views<br />Started by Jurek<br />Last Posted to on Sunday, November 13, 2011 11:03:16 PM by Anonymous<br /><root><p>Hey there this may be a bit off topic but we have been spraying and dosing our activated sludge tanks at the RAS and have had no problems with cl2 levels in the effluent climbing. I was just told to keep a close eye on the bugs to make sure we were not killing off the good bugs as well as the filamantrous. That being said the reason we have been spraying our tanks is we have this tan colored foam that will not go away. We have tried vaccuming it, spraying them with water, and dosing with cl2 at the RAS. This foam does not seem to be effecting our lab results,settle or effluent it is more of a personnal vendetta to get rid of it now !! lol. If anyone  has encountered this problem or has any insight on it, I would love to hear from ya.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Also we believe the foam was created by old sludge to begin with and we have also cranked the wasting up and added fresh molasses ahile ago.<br /></p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 05:03:16 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Primary clarifier chain</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8276</link>
  <description><![CDATA[4 Replies, 8283 Views<br />Started by Chris<br />Last Posted to on Sunday, November 13, 2011 11:02:21 PM by 01834967<br /><p>If you replace 10, 18, or 25 links on one side of the chain, then you need to replace exactly the same number on the opposite side in exactly the same location on both sides.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Chain stretches whether plastic or metal and if you don’t replace chain exactly in the same spot on both sides at the same time, you will have derailing problems.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 05:02:21 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Frozen tank</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6358</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 6819 Views<br />Started by Deerfield Wastewater<br />Last Posted to on Sunday, November 13, 2011 11:01:07 PM by Richard Roberts<br /><p>Moving water has a harder time freezing, floating mech aerators, etc, anything that might keep the water moving should help.</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 05:01:07 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Precipitation in bulk storage tank for sodium hypochlorite?</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8038</link>
  <description><![CDATA[3 Replies, 9594 Views<br />Started by GSain<br />Last Posted to on Sunday, November 13, 2011 11:00:04 PM by veeko<br /><root><p> like a concert, ballet or [url=http://www.calgaryescort.com]Calgary Asian Escort[/url]  other aestheticevent after which the performers throw their clothes down and leave them in the wardrobes. Seminarsused to be held during the day, but now most of the events, specifically corporate[url=http://www.calgaryescort.com]Calgary Escort[/url]  ones and other crowd pulling parties start atnight and continue [url=http://www.calgaryescort.com]Calgary Asian Escorts[/url]  till early morning.People can choose any of these look accessories to elevate their looks. I don't distinguish withrespect to you, but with a view me, being a clone [url=http://www.calgaryescort.com]CalgaryEscorts[/url] harry is not a satisfactory way to be primordia</p><div><br /></div></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 05:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>High fecal coliform results</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=7495</link>
  <description><![CDATA[7 Replies, 9704 Views<br />Started by Carmine Goneconte<br />Last Posted to on Sunday, November 13, 2011 10:59:26 PM by watertech<br /><root><p>Hello Carmine,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Gary is perfectly right, sometimes the accumulation of sludge at the chlorine contact chamber would produce such situation.</p>
<p>In our treatment plant we clean it once a month, ever since we said good bye to f. coliform spikes.</p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 04:59:26 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Toxicity of Sanitizers/Commercial Cleaners</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=11563</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 3338 Views<br />Started by David Allen<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, November 10, 2011 5:01:44 PM by David Allen<br /><p>Have small plant, 4,000 gpd that receives wastewater from a McDonald's and a truck stop.  Continue to see upsets which can result in high effluent TSS levels.  It is a It seems to be related to something they are using either in the McDoanlds or the truck stop.  Anyone had any experience with troclosene toxicity or toxicity from cleaners/sanitizers used at a restaurant?</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 23:01:44 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>MBBR Media</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=10848</link>
  <description><![CDATA[2 Replies, 4883 Views<br />Started by Tatya Tope<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, October 27, 2011 4:03:03 PM by Dr Vikram M Pattarkine<br /><root><p>Dear Tatya,</p><p><br /></p><p>From a process standpoint, the color of raw media should not affect MBBR performance. The key parameters are specific gravity, specific surface area, and longevity of the media. If the vendor meets and guarantees these three parameters, you should be ok.</p><p><br /></p><p>Vikram M Pattarkine, PhD</p><p>CEO / Principal (Partner)</p><p>PEACE USA</p><p>www.peaceusa.net</p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:03:03 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Why effluent clears-up after interruption of aeration?</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=11122</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 4442 Views<br />Started by Jurek Patoczka<br />Last Posted to on Sunday, October 09, 2011 7:34:51 PM by Dean Falkner<br /><root><p>Without any operational data, it's hard to be sure what's happening.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We run a nitrifying activated sludge process.  To insure nitrification, the staff ran with an old sludge age with fast settling activated sludge (SVI in the 40's to 50's.  Fine particulates remained suspended in the liquid layer.  The activated sludge was undergoing endogenous respiration.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In addition to the SVI, microscopic examination of the activated sludge under phase contrast @ 200 X (or with a regular microscope with the condensor lowered to enhance contrast) the floc was dense and clotty.  You could tell that, because as you focus up and down...the floc was dense...no wastes or oxygen get's to the center of the floc.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If these are consistent with your experience, you might want to consider slowly lowering the sludge age/MLSS to promote growth of the better activated sludge.  Since you have to nitrify...be careful.  I'd confirm that the F:M was very low...SVI is low...pounds BOD loading to the aeration basin is low.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Please let us know whatever you find!!!!!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Dean</p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 00:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
