Search Government Affairs!

Narrow your search by selecting one or more of the options below:
Keywords



To find WEFTEC materials please visit WEFTEC.ORG!

A hearing was convened by Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD), chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Water and Wildlife on October 4 - Nutrient Pollution: An Overview of Nutrient Reduction Approaches - to document nutrient pollution as a national threat and discuss the causes and impacts of nutrient pollution, in addition to the various mitigation approaches.  In his opening remarks, Sen. Cardin stated that “Dead zones with little or no oxygen caused by nutrient pollution are threatening America’s waters and lakes, as well as the jobs and regional economies nationwide that depend on these great water bodies”. In addition, he summarized the growing problem of nutrient pollution, especially in the Great lakes and coastal estuaries such as the Chesapeake Bay, the waters of Florida and the Gulf of Mexico.  Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) described EPA's approach to reducing nutrient pollutants as more like “coercive federalism” than cooperative federalism

 

A group comprised of two panels discussed the nationwide growing problem of nutrient pollution including dead zones and algal blooms, its causes, effects, impacts and mitigation approaches. Stormwater was considered to be a major contributor of non-point source leading to nutrient pollution, especially within the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Green Infrastructure was also touted as a promising technique to mitigate nutrient pollution. Mr. George Hawkins of D.C. Water highlighted some of city’s projects that are promoting the use of Green Infrastructure to protect the health of the Chesapeake Bay, and includes construction of rain gardens, green roofs and bioswales along streets to reduce CSOs throughout the District and “The Digester Project” which involves thermal hydrolysis for wastewater treatment, thereby producing clean, green renewable power and a high quality soil product.

 

Many of the witnesses had differing opinions about the extent of the nutrient problem and the best approaches. However, they stressed that states must be give authority and should work on a watershed basis to reduce nutrient pollution and that a one-size fits all (a single state-wide nutrient standard) approach is not practical to implement nutrient pollution reductions. On this issue, Ms. Shellie Chard-McClary (a WEF member with the State of OK) testified that “A single number for nitrogen or phosphorus is not often an accurate indicator of adverse ecological or water quality effects. We have to look at other factors - like biology - and develop with EPA a flexible approach to controlling nutrients in the environment”.  The preferred approach by witnesses would involve collaboration between various states and EPA and working towards mitigating nutrient pollution at a watershed scale. Witness Statements

 

January 18, 2013

House Passes Sandy Aid Bill and Senate Likely to Approve Next Week  [-]

On Jan. 15, the House passes an Emergency Supplemental Aid Bill to help states affected by Superstorm Sandy.  The $50.5 billion package for disaster relief will provide new aid heading to communities hit by the storm.  In late 2012, the Senate passed a similar package for $60.4 billion, which later expired at the end of the 112th Congress. That bill is largely reflected in both the package passed in House on Jan.15 and in the $9.7 billion measure expanding borrowing authority for the National Flood Insurance Program (HR 41) that was cleared on Jan. 4 by the House and has been signed into law by the President. The two House-passed bills combined are equal to the $60.4 billion requested by the President.

Due to resistance from fiscally conservative Republican members of the House, the initial aid package offered in the House was for $17 billion, and the chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, Rep. Hal Rogers (R-KY) pledged to provide additional funding through the regular annual appropriations bills.  However, Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) also took steps to allow the House to vote Jan. 15 on a $33.67 billion amendment by House Appropriations Energy and Water Subcommittee Chairman Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-NJ) that provided many of the other funds requested by Obama and backed by the Senate. Ultimately, the amendment offered passed and was incorporated into Rogers's bill.  But the amendment and the overall bill only managed to clear the House with heavy Democratic support.  Minus that, there was not enough Republican support to pass either one. On final passage, the tally was 241-180, with 192 Democrats and only 49 Republicans voting in favor. Voting against the measure were 179 Republicans and 1 Democrat.

The Frelinghuysen amendment contains line-item funding to aid water and wastewater facilities recover and design for possible future natural disasters.  In areas impacted by the storm in EPA Region 2 there is $500 million in capitalization grants through the Clean Water State Revolving Funds for wastewater  facilities and $100 million for capitalization grants through the Safe Drinking Water Act.  The aid package will require states that use the funding to use not less than 20 percent but not more than 30 percent of the amount of its capitalization grants to provide additional subsidization to eligible recipients in the form of forgiveness of principal, negative interest loans or grants or any combination of these.  Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-NJ) attempted to offer an amendment to lift the 30 percent cap, but the House Rules Committee restricted the total number of amendments offered to the bill to three.  The aid package requires that funding be used for “projects whose purpose is to reduce flood damage risk and vulnerability or to enhance resiliency to rapid hydrologic change or a natural disaster at treatment works” in EPA Region 2.

The Senate is expected to consider the House aid package next week and comments out of Senate Democratic leaders suggest that the package will be cleared fairly quickly because the bill is relatively similar to the package previously passed by the Senate.  “It's great news for families, communities, and small businesses in our region that the House—after weeks of delay—finally passed an emergency relief bill for Superstorm Sandy,” said Sens. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), Charles Schumer (D-NY), Bob Menendez (D-NJ), and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY). “Our region extends a helping hand any time another community suffers from a major disaster, and we're pleased that the House voted to provide this emergency relief for New Jersey and New York.”

In a separate statement, Schumer, the No. 3 Democrat in the Senate, said the House bill is “close enough” to what officials from the region need. He said he will urge his colleagues to pass it quickly.

 

EPA Releases Financial Capability Framework for Municipal Clean Water Act Requirements  [+]
ASCE Releases Final Report in Failure to Act Series, Detailing Comprehensive Impacts of Failing to Invest in America’s Infrastructure  [+]
Integrated Planning Workshops Scheduled  [+]
Secretary Salazar, USGS Director McNutt Both Leaving Interior  [+]
Agriculture Secretary Vilsack to Continue Service in Obama Administration  [+]
EPA’s 2011 Toxics Release Inventory Shows Air Pollutants Continue to Decline  [+]
EPA January 30 Webinar on New Recreational Criteria  [+]
Register for WEF-AWWA Fly-In, April 17-18  [+]