Water Environment Federation (WEF) Discussion Forums
Home      Members   Calendar   Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      

Home » Archives » Archived Forum Topics » Disinfection » UV disinfection enhancement using Ozone

UV disinfection enhancement using OzoneExpand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 1/9/2006 1:42:03 PM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/15/2006 10:39:34 AM
Posts: 1, Visits: 11
We currently have a Trojan UV disinfection system. Periodically we experience high fecal counts due to performance issues and must add supplemental Sodium Hypochlorite for control. Has any one used Ozone in conjunction with UV? I am beginning to look at it as a possible enhancement for our system. We have Pure Oxygen available on site.
Post #800
Posted 11/30/2007 1:30:36 AM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/30/2007 1:19:15 AM
Posts: 1, Visits: 2
Combined Ozonation-UV system would provide a dual barrier disinfection, might be a good fit for you.
Post #7601
Posted 12/3/2007 1:17:07 PM


Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:59:47 AM
Posts: 261, Visits: 693
When you use hypo is there a residual that need to be dechlorinated?  I see where they are dechlorinating with UV, but at 15X the normal disinfection dose.  From my expierence of old ozone technology using the equipment infrequently will be a problem, also ozone is an oxidant that will oxidize KI to I2 and show up as Cl2 in the total chlorine test.   It is also very toxic to fish as it attacks the gills etc.
Post #7638
Posted 1/23/2008 2:48:28 AM
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 8/22/2008 8:33:59 AM
Posts: 20, Visits: 18
Ozone is a very costly process and I suspect there would be better processes to meet your requirements. The two most cost effective are chlorine and UV disinfection.

Do you know why your UV system is not performing. The lamps need to be changed at the specified hours run. Any lamps out will significantly affect performance. The sleeves need to be cleaned on a three monthly basis (unwiped) or six monthly basis for the wiped system (and you need to ensure the acticlean system is in good working order, every six months). On this basis the sleeves need to be sparkling clean on cleaning to mildly cloudy when cleaning is required. Take the lamps out of the effluent and rinse with potable water and then allow 2 minutes for the water to run off and the sleeves to air dry. Then observe the fouling. I would recommend 5-10 % phosphoric acid solution for cleaning. Perhaps your Trojan rep can troubleshoot the unit for you.

The effluent quality needs to be suitable for UV to work. Beyond 12 mg/L TSS you will find UV ineffective. This usually results from a problem with your activated sludge system (such as insufficent aeration (SVI>250 ml/g) or clarification. You could troubleshoot your A/S plant or look at installing a filter (sand, cloth media) upstream of the UV unit.

The UV transmittance of the effluent is paramount and I would recommend you take some samples and have them analysed by the lab. If the design UVT value is higher than the measured value then  you need to look at having your UV unit resized by your Trojan rep. and then look at further capacity. Things that interfere are colour (numbers greater than 50), TSS (>12 mg/L), COD and iron (> 1.5 mg/L). Colour can be affected by seasonal water supplies with high colour.

For chlorine you need an approriate detention time. A 30 min time at peak hourly dry weather flow is generally required to meet 200 TC per 100 mL. You would need to ensure your outlet residual meets your permit standards. May need dechlorination

 As for ozone, you are looking at a lot more complexity and cost.

 I hope that I have given you some things to think about.

Regards

Grant H, Australia

Post #8085
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Reading This TopicExpand / Collapse
Active Users: 1 (1 guest, 0 members, 0 anonymous members)
No members currently viewing this topic.

PermissionsExpand / Collapse

All times are GMT -5:00, Time now is 7:10am

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.0.0 © 2008
Execution: 0.125. 10 queries. Compression Enabled.