﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Water Environment Federation (WEF) Discussion Forums / Technical Discussion Group in Spanish / Archives / Archived Forum Topics  / Reject handling of RO / Latest Posts</title><generator>Water Environment Federation (WEF) Discussion Forums</generator><description>Water Environment Federation (WEF) Discussion Forums</description><link>http://www.wef.org/TechnicalDiscussions/</link><webMaster>jfuller@wef.org</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:06:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Reject handling of RO</title><link>http://www.wef.org/TechnicalDiscussions/Topic7236-7-1.aspx</link><description>Brine crystallisation technology is possible and works but as Bill says requires heaps of dollars. I have done a lot of research on this as i am heavily involved in 3 RO projects where concentrate disposal is a big issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whilst zero discharge is possible the operating costs are huge , depending on your source of energy , quantity /quality etc i have seen numbers as high as $15 /kl of permeate (not concentrate) but this may be an extreme number.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What option is "best practice" for you will depend on many factors including:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Size of plant&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Water quality&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3)Local climate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4) Geographical location&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5) Land availability&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6)Environmental objectives.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;7)Energy costs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TerryF</description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:17:10 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>TerryF</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Reject handling of RO</title><link>http://www.wef.org/TechnicalDiscussions/Topic7236-7-1.aspx</link><description>Absolutely. A brine concentrator followed by a crystallizer is a technically &amp;amp; commercially viable approach to produce a Zero Liquid Discharge system (and a few have actually done it) -- all it takes is LOADS of $$$. In reality, most all facilities add a small "pony" RO to further concentrate the primary RO reject and produce additional permeate. Beyond that, it depends on local conditions (environment, electrical and disposal costs, etc., etc., etc.). One might also consider proven technologies such as evaporation (solar &amp;amp; mechanical) and distillation (multiple effect, multi-stage flash, &amp;amp; mechanical vapor recompression) methods.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No proof, no data, and I don't operate any systems but an electrolytic unit by an Israli company has caught my eye. It'll be months (possibly years) before I have a definitive answer however.</description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:34:20 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Bill Gaines</dc:creator></item><item><title>Reject handling of RO</title><link>http://www.wef.org/TechnicalDiscussions/Topic7236-7-1.aspx</link><description>Can some body throw some light on this- what are the current international practices? Is evaporation and crystallisation viable commercially. Is there any other thechnology or technique- Kindly suggest a solution.</description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:23:20 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Membrane Worker</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>