﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Water Environment Federation (WEF) Discussion Forums / WEF Discussion Forums / Operation &amp; Maintenance  / Effluent Parameter Monitoring Frequency / Latest Posts</title><generator>Water Environment Federation (WEF) Discussion Forums</generator><description>Water Environment Federation (WEF) Discussion Forums</description><link>http://www.wef.org/TechnicalDiscussions/</link><webMaster>jfuller@wef.org</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:44:02 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Effluent Parameter Monitoring Frequency</title><link>http://www.wef.org/TechnicalDiscussions/Topic9552-16-1.aspx</link><description>I beleive Wisconsin uses this.  Most of our testing was reduced on our last permit and stayed that way on new permit. All 7 samples per week parameters were reduced to 5 samples per week. This included BOD, TSS, Phosphorus, Chlorine and fecal coliform were reduced from 2X/week to once a week.</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:42:13 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>hoople</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Effluent Parameter Monitoring Frequency</title><link>http://www.wef.org/TechnicalDiscussions/Topic9552-16-1.aspx</link><description>I'm not from a utility, but your question rang a bell in my head from some research I did on wastewater systems in Oklahoma and Indiana; I think that both of those states adopted the guidance that you mention.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is a link to the Oklahoma rule: http://www.oar.state.ok.us/viewhtml/252_690-3-91.htm, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and this Indiana page mentions the opportunity to reduce NPDES permit sampling frequency as well as reporting frequency: http://www.in.gov/idem/4433.htm</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:41:28 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Julius W</dc:creator></item><item><title>Effluent Parameter Monitoring Frequency</title><link>http://www.wef.org/TechnicalDiscussions/Topic9552-16-1.aspx</link><description>&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-layout-grid-align: none"&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt;I am requesting your help to determine which state regulatory agencies have adopted guidance from EPA about performance-based reduction in monitoring frequencies.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-layout-grid-align: none"&gt;&lt;?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-layout-grid-align: none"&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt;In 1996, EPA issued a guidance memorandum to its regional directors titled &lt;B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"&gt;Interim Guidance for Performance - Based Reductions of NPDES Permit Monitoring Frequencies.&lt;/B&gt; &lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;In summary, the memo outlines a process for granting reductions in monitoring frequency of effluent parameters, if the long-term average of the parameter is below the monthly average permit limit by certain percentages (and certain other conditions are met).&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;  &lt;/SPAN&gt;The memo is attached for your information.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-layout-grid-align: none"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-layout-grid-align: none"&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt;The Washington Department of Ecology incorporates the guidance in its Permit Writer’s Guide and I have seen it referenced in a Fact Sheet by one of &lt;?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /&gt;&lt;st1:State w:st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place w:st="on"&gt;California&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:State&gt;’s Regional Water Quality Control Boards.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-layout-grid-align: none"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-layout-grid-align: none"&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt;I would appreciate your help with the following information:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-layout-grid-align: none"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.4in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in; mso-layout-grid-align: none; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .35in"&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Courier New'"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="mso-list: Ignore"&gt;&lt;FONT size=3&gt;o&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;     &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3&gt;What state regulatory agency issued your NPDES permit?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-layout-grid-align: none"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.4in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in; mso-layout-grid-align: none; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .35in"&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Courier New'"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="mso-list: Ignore"&gt;&lt;FONT size=3&gt;o&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;     &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3&gt;Has your state regulatory agency adopted this EPA guidance?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-layout-grid-align: none"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.4in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in; mso-layout-grid-align: none; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .35in"&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Courier New'"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="mso-list: Ignore"&gt;&lt;FONT size=3&gt;o&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;     &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;FONT size=3&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman"&gt;If not, what is the basis for not adopting it?&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt;Feel free to respond to me directly. &lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;I will post a summary of the feedback by the end of August. &lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;Thank you for your help. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt;This request is posted under Operation &amp;amp; Maintenance, Laboratory Management &amp;amp; Technical Issues, and Biological Nutrient Removal.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:47:53 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Woodie</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>