WEF Discussions — Now on LinkedIn!

WEF is pleased to announce the creation of free LinkedIn groups associated with its technical discussion forum topics. Through these LinkedIn groups, members will be able to view and participate in discussions, as well as communicate with one another via direct messages. Share your experiences and knowledge, ask questions and respond to other discussions as frequently as you like!

You must have a LinkedIn profile to join a LinkedIn group; you can create your profile here. If you already have a LinkedIn profile, all you need to do is submit a request to join one or all of the following groups:

Water Environment Federation (Main) | Biosolids | Collection Systems | Nutrients | Stormwater 
Utility Management | Water Reuse | Water for Jobs | Watershed Management | Laboratory Practices 

RSS Feed Print
Is the 22nd Edition of SM an "Editorial" revision?
01487708
Posted: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 9:28 AM
Joined: 10/12/2009
Posts: 11


EPA published a letter stating that the 22nd edition of SM is merely an editorial version of the approved method and issued a national ATP approval.  Since PDF files cannot be attached to these posts, please send me an e-mail if you want a copy of the letter.

 

However, some have noticed differences in method practices such as the inclusion of MS/MSDs in the BOD method and the incorporation of a change in the incubator temperature reading schedule found in 9020B.

 

It is becoming apparent that the 22nd edition is not a mere correction of spelling, but potentially significant changes in practice.  It would appear that SM is incorporating the 12 QC elements that EPA first proposed then subsequently eliminated as required in the final Methods Update Rule (the 12 were relegated to option 3 for when a method lacks QC).

 

From a legal standpoint the letter is merely an ATP approval of the 22nd edition and is an option to the approved method cited in 40CFR part 136.3.  The selection of methods is your choice so be sure you know what you are obligating yourself to do if you select the 22nd edition.

 

The question - after all of the expose - is what other changes have been made?  Have any of you noticed a difference in method or QC requirements between the approved method and the 22nd edtion version?