<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <!-- Generated by Ektron CMS400.NET -->
 <channel>
  <title>WEF Discussion Forums : Laboratory Management and Technical Issues : Cyanide By Proposed ASTM D7511-09</title>
  <description></description>
 <item>
  <title></title>
  <description><![CDATA[<root><p>Our lab does just enough CN analyses to be taking a strong look at this OI/ASTM method that's in the EPA 9/23/10 proposed update to 40 CFR 136.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Does anybody out there have experience with doing CN by segmented flow analyzer via UV digestion followed by amperometric detection?  Does it really do a good job avoiding interferences?  How about saving time?  Does anybody have any return-on-investment data?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Chuck Lytle</p></root>
<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title></title>
  <description><![CDATA[It cut down our quarterly 4 days of CN testing to 1 day. Plus it does a good job reducing/elimiting interferences. Check out the webinars from OI Analytical.  <a href="http://www.oico.com/default.aspx?id=appcntrwbnrbypl&amp;PLID=16">http://www.oico.com/default.aspx?id=appcntrwbnrbypl&amp;PLID=16</a>.
<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
