<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <!-- Generated by Ektron CMS400.NET -->
 <channel>
  <title>WEF Discussion Forums : Laboratory Management and Technical Issues : Which Ammonia Probe is Best?</title>
  <description></description>
 <item>
  <title></title>
  <description><![CDATA[<root><p>My laboratory is looking to buy a new probe for ammonia for wastewater samples.  We are now using the Hach Ammonia Gas Sensing Combination Electrode (Model 51927-00).  I find that this Probe is very hard to calibrate; slopes are most of the time not within range.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>What type of probes is everyone using and which ones do you prefer?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Any help would be wonderful.<img title="happy" alt="happy" src="http://www.wef.org/WorkArea/threadeddisc/emoticons/happy.gif" />  </p></root>
<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:16:29 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title></title>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>We are using the Old style Orion ammonia probe. We have had it for some time and are satisfied with it. Not too many problems.</p>
<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:25:56 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title></title>
  <description><![CDATA[<root><p>We also have found the old Orion probe to be best but you have to use the loose membranes. The bonded caps are too erratic for consistent readings.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Recently I noticed Orion came out with a new type probe that was touted as more sensitive. I tried it out and it only lasted two days. I have not been able to figure out why. It did have some interesting features like a translucent body so you could see the fill level.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Another company, VWR, came out with their own branded ammonia probe that looks just like the old Orion probes but uses different filling solution.</p>
<p>I could not get documentation on that filling solution so I have not been able to use it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p></root>
<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:31:44 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title></title>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>We have been using the Orion 95-12 Ammonia probe.  It has lasted longer than we expected and is very rugged.</p>
<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:15:52 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title></title>
  <description><![CDATA[<root><p>Hi,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We have been using the new Orion High Performance Ammonia probe for almost a year.  Have not had a single problem with it.  Remember that the HP Ammonia probe has its own filling solution.  You cannot use the old type.  I agree that the loose membranes work better than the bonded ones.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ann</p>
<p> </p></root>
<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:50:45 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title></title>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>HACH INNER BODY CHECKS ARE EXCELLENT BUT THIER MEMBRANE CAPS LEAVE SOMETHING TO BE DESIRED. THEY ARE ONLY GOOD FOR ONE DETERMINATION AND AFTER THAT THEY ARE SHOT.</p>
<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:18:39 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title></title>
  <description><![CDATA[<p> Our lab considered using an Ammonia probe.  When I tested them, they 
seemed extremely unreliable.  I had the most trouble with samples that 
had been acid preserved and brought back to neutral.  The membranes would last no more than 4 or 5 
samples.  I primarily used the hach 51927-00 probes.  Is this typical of all ammonia probes.  We're currently using a homemade machine that runs a modified phenate method, and while it still works we're always looking for ways to streamline the workload.  Especially in light of the fact that distillation is unnecessary when using the probes.  We typically run 15+ samples a day. Any advice?  What are the probes best suited for?<br /></p>
<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:15:33 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title></title>
  <description><![CDATA[<root><p>One problem with the electrode method is the ISA solution. Standard methods calls for a 10 N NaOH solution with 0.1 M EDTA solution for pH adjustment. It calls for enough solution to reach a pH of 11 for analysis. I find this solution hard to make and we use a 5.0 N NaOH and .05 M EDTA and just use about 2 ml for pH adjustment instead of 1 ml. The 20th edition of Standard should have been written with 5 N but some how it was not changed even though the problem was pointed out.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If you use an Orion electrode their ISA will also include methanol to eliminate grease covering the membrane allong with the EDTA to eliminate the hardness plugging the membrane. I have been using this solution for years and the ammonia 9512 electrode works well. We analyze H2SO4 preserved samples of influent, effluent, and streams.</p></root>
<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:02:01 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title></title>
  <description><![CDATA[<root><p>How would you comment to the efficacy of the 9512 probe membranes.  It seems several people have had issues with said membranes.  Perhaps the greater normality ISA solution is part of the problem?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>We have an online probe that might benefit from the addition of methanol to prevent oil fouling, but the samples in the lab we have conducted our studies on don't typically have this issue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I appreciate your input, as I would really like to use this as a solution to our ammonia testing.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thank you.<br /></p></root>
<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:41:30 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title></title>
  <description><![CDATA[<root><p>We have used this electrode and membranes for some time now and we have had no problems. I prefer to add the ISA while mixing and then put the probe in the pH 11 solution for analysis so the probe will only be in pH 11 for the analysis. The lab techs prefer to put the probe in the acid preserved sample and then add the ISA solution. They feel that the probe recovers faster from one ammonia level sample to the next sample. Both was seem to work good.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The higher caustic strength might not mix as easy so the pH hitting the membrane might be higher and cause damage, I do not know. My problem was getting the EDTA in solution with the 10 N NaOH. We do use a pipet despenser so the higher strength ISA would destroy it a lot quicker than the 5 N ISA.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p></root>
<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:01:44 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title></title>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>We use the Orion 9512 with loose membranes.  Our current probe is several years old and still works fine.  We use a new membrane each run with a week between runs.  We use 10N NaOH without the EDTA because we do not have problems with silver or mercury interference.  We used to use the Orion ISA but since we did not need the EDTA or methanol, we just make our own NaOH now. </p>
<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:37:12 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
