<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <!-- Generated by Ektron CMS400.NET -->
 <channel>
  <title>WEF Discussion Forums : Utility Management</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=topics&amp;f=549&amp;groupid=-1</link>
  <description>Privatization, Benchmarking, Management Information Systems, Chemical Use</description>
 <item>
  <title>Geographic Information Systems for WWTP&#39;s</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935234</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 2597 Views<br />Started by Thayes<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, November 06, 2012 3:11:43 PM by Thayes<br /><p>At our Wastewater Treatment Plant, we have constructed a Geographic Information System (GIS) database for all our piping and valves. It has been a great success; we have each pipe associated with its drawing, mapped all our buried utilities (piping, electrical, fiber optic, instrumentation), hyperlinked photos. We have constructed an online Map Viewer which shows all the piping, pumps, and valves across our entire Plant. We have dedicated two people, full time to this long-term endeavor. It is a great tool that helps our Ops &amp; Maint staff easily become familiar with the piping layouts and valve locations, a training tool, and is used in emergencies to find which valve(s) to close. They no longer have to depend on the person who will retire soon for the answers.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I am looking for anyone else who has constructed a GIS for their Plant? please share your experience. </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:11:43 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>City of Kuna, Id - WWTP Opportunity</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935210</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 3031 Views<br />Started by DPFG<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:15:28 PM by DPFG<br /><p><span>The City of Kuna, Idaho hereby announces that sealed proposals will be received for the PURCHASE, LEASE, MANAGEMENT, OPERATION AND/OR OTHER MUTUALLY AGREEABLE TRANSACTION involving the 3.5 million gallon per day Kuna North Waste Water Treatment Plant.<span>  </span></span></p>
<p><span><span></span></span> </p>
<p><span>Proposals will be received until 4:00 pm on October 2, 2012, Mountain Daylight Time. Proposals received after the due date and time will not be considered and no proposer may withdraw their proposal after the time set for the opening.</span> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span>Specifications and instructions for submission of proposals are available as of August 29, 2012 at </span><a href="http://www.dpfg.com/kuna/"><span><font color="#800080">http://www.dpfg.com/kuna/</font></span></a><font face="Calibri"> </font><span> or by email from Matthew Look at </span><a href="mailto:matthew.look@dpfg.com"><span>matthew.look@dpfg.com</span></a><span> or contact directly at 602-381-3226 ext. 15.<span>  </span>Copies of the Request for Proposals may also be obtained from the Kuna City Clerk located at 763 West Avalon, Kuna, Idaho.</span></p>
<p><span></span> </p>
<p><span>The Kuna City Council reserves the right to disregard all non-conforming, non-responsive or conditional proposals, to waive any minor informality, to reject all proposals or to accept the proposal it deems best.</span> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 17:15:28 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Kuna, ID - WWTP Request For Proposals - August 29, 2012</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935208</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 1759 Views<br />Started by DPFG<br />Last Posted to on Friday, August 31, 2012 1:03:50 PM by DPFG<br /><p align="center"><b><span>Advertisement for </span></b> </p>
<p align="center"><b><span>Request for Proposals Associated with the</span></b> </p>
<p align="center"><b><span>Purchase, Lease, Management, Operation and/or </span></b> </p>
<p align="center"><b><span>Other Mutually Agreeable Transaction Related to the </span></b> </p>
<p align="center"><b><span>Kuna North Waste Water Treatment Plant</span></b> </p>
<p><span>The City of Kuna, Idaho hereby announces that sealed proposals will be received for the PURCHASE, LEASE, MANAGEMENT, OPERATION AND/OR OTHER MUTUALLY AGREEABLE TRANSACTION involving the 3.5 million gallon per day Kuna North Waste Water Treatment Plant.<span>  </span></span> </p>
<p><span>Proposals will be received until 4:00 pm on October 2, 2012, Mountain Daylight Time. Proposals received after the due date and time will not be considered and no proposer may withdraw their proposal after the time set for the opening.</span> </p>
<p><span>Specifications and instructions for submission of proposals are available as of August 29, 2012 at </span><a href="http://www.dpfg.com/kuna/"><span><font color="#800080">http://www.dpfg.com/kuna/</font></span></a><font face="Calibri"> </font><span> or by email from Matthew Look at </span><a href="mailto:matthew.look@dpfg.com"><span>matthew.look@dpfg.com</span></a><span> or contact directly at 602-381-3226 ext. 15.<span>  </span>Copies of the Request for Proposals may also be obtained from the Kuna City Clerk located at 763 West Avalon, Kuna, Idaho.</span> </p>
<p><span>The Kuna City Council reserves the right to disregard all non-conforming, non-responsive or conditional proposals, to waive any minor informality, to reject all proposals or to accept the proposal it deems best.</span> </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:03:50 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Glass is the new packing material</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589934822</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 1008 Views<br />Started by choprajeevika<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, June 07, 2012 8:00:03 AM by choprajeevika<br /><p> </p>
<p><span>Just came across this. According to the newest study
reports, glass is the greenest packaging material.</span> What do you think?</p>
<p></p>
<p class="body">Web link: <a href="http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/article3422064.ece">http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/article3422064.ece</a></p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:00:03 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Glass is greenest packing material</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589934821</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 557 Views<br />Started by choprajeevika<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, June 07, 2012 5:42:48 AM by choprajeevika<br /><p> </p>
<p align="center"><span> <font face="Calibri">Glass is greenest packing material</font></span> </p>
<p><span>Just came across this. According to the newest study reports, glass is the greenest packaging material.</span> </p>
<p class="body">The human toxicity potential of glass packaging is the lowest compared with plastic, metal and paper, says the first-ever lifecycle assessment study of the Indian glass industry. </p>
<p class="body">The study was commissioned by the All India Glass Manufacturers' Federation, led by companies such as Hindusthan National Glass, Piramal, AGI Glaspac and Vitrium Glass, to assess the environmental impact of glass as a packaging medium. It collected data from 28 furnaces and covered 72 per cent of the domestic glass production. </p>
<p class="body">The assessment, carried out by independent global expert PE International and released here on Monday, says that glass packaging has the highest green potential and the lowest global warming risk, compared with plastic, paper and metal, especially when it comes to processed food and beverages. </p>
<p class="body">“Glass is the most suitable packaging medium to retain product quality and is least damaging to the environment. Also, it is endlessly recyclable,' said Mr Juergen Stichling, Global Director, PE International. </p>
<p class="body">He said increased use of recycled glass in India from 35 per cent at present to 75 per cent will reduce the industry's carbon footprint by almost 40 per cent. </p>
<p class="body">Mr Mukul Somany, President of the Federation, said the industry was planning to take measures to improve the green profile of glass. These include adoption of technology to reduce glass weight from five per cent to 20 per cent, increase recycling from 35 per cent to 50 per cent, and raise the use of natural gas as fuel instead of furnace oil. </p>
<p class="body">The country's glass packaging industry's estimated value is over Rs 6,000 crore, with the country among the top 15 markets for glass packaging globally. </p>
<p class="body">In India, though, plastic is still the preferred medium for packaging processed food and beverages with 48 per cent share, followed by paper, metal and glass. </p>
<p class="body"> </p>
<p class="body"><strong>Source: </strong><a href="http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/article3422064.ece"><font color="#800080"><strong>http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/article3422064.ece</strong></font></a><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><font face="Calibri"> </font>  </strong></p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Glass the new packing material</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589934820</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 562 Views<br />Started by choprajeevika<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, June 07, 2012 5:38:32 AM by choprajeevika<br /><p> </p>
<p align="center"><b><span><font face="Calibri">Glass is greenest packing material</font></span></b> </p>
<p><span>Just came across this. According to the newest study reports, glass is the greenest packaging material.</span> </p>
<p class="body">The human toxicity potential of glass packaging is the lowest compared with plastic, metal and paper, says the first-ever lifecycle assessment study of the Indian glass industry. </p>
<p class="body">The study was commissioned by the All India Glass Manufacturers' Federation, led by companies such as Hindusthan National Glass, Piramal, AGI Glaspac and Vitrium Glass, to assess the environmental impact of glass as a packaging medium. It collected data from 28 furnaces and covered 72 per cent of the domestic glass production. </p>
<p class="body">The assessment, carried out by independent global expert PE International and released here on Monday, says that glass packaging has the highest green potential and the lowest global warming risk, compared with plastic, paper and metal, especially when it comes to processed food and beverages. </p>
<p class="body">“Glass is the most suitable packaging medium to retain product quality and is least damaging to the environment. Also, it is endlessly recyclable,' said Mr Juergen Stichling, Global Director, PE International. </p>
<p class="body">He said increased use of recycled glass in India from 35 per cent at present to 75 per cent will reduce the industry's carbon footprint by almost 40 per cent. </p>
<p class="body">Mr Mukul Somany, President of the Federation, said the industry was planning to take measures to improve the green profile of glass. These include adoption of technology to reduce glass weight from five per cent to 20 per cent, increase recycling from 35 per cent to 50 per cent, and raise the use of natural gas as fuel instead of furnace oil. </p>
<p class="body">The country's glass packaging industry's estimated value is over Rs 6,000 crore, with the country among the top 15 markets for glass packaging globally. </p>
<p class="body">In India, though, plastic is still the preferred medium for packaging processed food and beverages with 48 per cent share, followed by paper, metal and glass. </p>
<p class="body"> </p>
<p class="body"><strong>Source: </strong><a href="http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/article3422064.ece"><font color="#800080"><strong>http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/article3422064.ece</strong></font></a><strong> </strong></p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:38:32 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Laboratory Staff Performance and Compensation</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451218</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 3762 Views<br />Started by Jason Graham<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, December 13, 2011 10:54:51 PM by Jason Graham<br /><p>What criteria do other entities use to measure and compensate water and wastewater laboratory personnel?  Is compensation based on a defined skill based criteria, merit system, certifications acquired, annual perfomance bonuses, or?  Are there productivty benchmark criteria that have proven effective over time?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thank You!</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 04:54:51 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Enticing New Blood for the Profession</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=7339</link>
  <description><![CDATA[2 Replies, 10438 Views<br />Started by Phyllis Rand<br />Last Posted to on Wednesday, August 24, 2011 6:04:22 AM by Dean Falkner<br /><root><p>Hi Phyllis:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You hit a wide range of issues and challenges for the small utility.  However, the issues probably apply to everyone.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Communication is always a challenge,</strong> but folks getting frustrated tend to clam-up.  That's compounded by possibly getting a challenging Board.  The thing is....people can't understand or respect what is going on unless someone actually explains how or why it was done and why that's important.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Prioritizing what's really important can be a chronic problem:</strong>  I understand the idea of cleaning clarifier, but it really isn't a critical element of daily or weekly operation (for most plants).</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:04:22 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Average Winter Consumption/Sewer Cap</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=10727</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 4914 Views<br />Started by KarenWhichard<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 6:40:51 PM by Dean Falkner<br /><root><p>Great question!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>There are multiple issues that are worth consideration.  They include:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>FIXED FEES:  More often than not, utilities attempt to divide expenses for all sorts of issues against BOD, SS, NH3, P, and flow.  The fact is, there's no legitimate way to assess many fixed fees against these parameter.  They're overhead.  Examples include:  City Adminstration, Sewer Billing, Utility Management, and sewer cleaning have nothing to do with those parameters.  Address this issue and the volume charges become less significant.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I&amp;I:  People want a summer credit, but flows don't go down in the summer.  The fact is, many folks have illegal connections to the collection system (sump pumps etc).  Why give a credit if the folks actual flow increases????</p>
<p> </p>
<p>BE CREATIVE:  If you want folks to allow clear water inspections, install rain water containers, stormwater control....why not offer a credit on the summer sewer bill on the basis of meeting a given performance.  Perhaps it's worth having the service lateral televised to identify ones that need replacement.  Carrying it to the next step...give them a credit for eliminating clear water by lining the lateral.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks for the question...you've got me thinking for our application!!!!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Dean Falkner</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:40:51 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Wastewater treatment Benchmarking</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6096</link>
  <description><![CDATA[2 Replies, 11930 Views<br />Started by Lilly Longshore<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 6:29:32 PM by Dean Falkner<br /><root><p>Lilly:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You may want to request a copy of budgets from similar sized utilities, larger utilities, and smaller utilities.  When you see things that don't make sense...ask.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A real thing that surprised me was how much more effective smaller utilities perform at times.  If there's a chronic problem, a small operator that doesn't want to get bothered will find a permanent solution.  Larger plant operators often say "I've got people to do that".</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If you bug folks for information, reciprocate by providing a summary of your results or perhaps do a paper with your findings for the local MA.  Finally, don't forget to share it with WE&amp;T staff too.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Good luck and sorry to be responding late!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Dean Falkner</p>
<p> </p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:29:32 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Inter-Governmental Agreements /  Cost Sharing</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=5990</link>
  <description><![CDATA[2 Replies, 17846 Views<br />Started by MAS<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:42:07 PM by Jesse Moffett<br /><root><p>The authority which I work for has an intermunicpal agreement in which the operational costs are allocated to flow and BOD delivered. The debt service is handled separately based on ownership of the Flow and BOD capacity of the facility. We are only in the treatment business and have two customers a county and a city. We have metering and sampling stations located at the point of entry to our truck main going to the plant. From the stations we get flow contributions and BOD contributions and distribute operational costs based on those results on a monthly basis. </p>
<p>We would like to expand this to include TN and TP now that we are doing nutrient removal but we are have a real problem with allocation of costs between the components of flow, BOD, TSS, TN, and TP hence I can understand why one would want to allocate on ownership to simplify everything but we see some real inequities (I/I, high strength waste, industrial vs. residential and others). Also we do separate out insurance, permit fees and other items based on capacity ownership.</p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:42:07 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Work task descriptions</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=9577</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 7175 Views<br />Started by agerby<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, March 03, 2011 2:59:06 PM by agerby<br /><p>I've searched high and low and can't find samples of water/wastewater standard work task descriptions.  I'm looking for a one page task description for say, responding to a sewer backup, listing PPE, safety precautions, and a list of steps to finish the job. Our crews do adequate work, but we don't have written standard procedures.  Anyone have samples to share?</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:59:06 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Cold Water Treatment using Poly Aluminum Chloride</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=9131</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 6094 Views<br />Started by Tom Cleveland<br />Last Posted to on Monday, January 10, 2011 2:24:11 PM by Tom Cleveland<br /><root><p> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri">This is Tom Cleveland, Plants &amp; Engineering Manager, Decatur Utilities in Decatur Alabama.  We own and operate a 68-MGD conventional surface water treatment plant which uses the Tennessee River as a source.  Our treatment processes are: coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection with chlorine gas.  The chemicals we use are: Sodium Permanganate (20%), pre-chlorine, poly-aluminum chloride (PACl), fluoride, post-lime, post-chlorine, and poly-orthophosphate.  On January 2, 2011 following a rain event which dropped ~5 inches of rain in 2 days, we had an elevated raw water turbidity of ~70-80 NTU.  We were feeding ~30-40 mg/L of PACl at the beginning and during the first few hours of the increased raw turbidity event.  We ended up "loosing" all of our 40 filters due to high filtered turbidities (~0.3 NTU) and high settled water turbidities (~16.0 NTU).  We eventually solved our problem by increasing our coagulant (PACl) dosage rate anywhere from 85 to 105 mg/L.  </font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Do you know of any water plant that has had to feed PACl at that high of a dosage rate?  Also, do you have as ideas as to what might create such a high coagulant demand with a raw water turbidity of only ~70 NTU?  Are there any resources or technical advice available to us as WEF members?  If so, please contact me via phone or e-mail.”</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Thank you.</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Tom Cleveland, p.E.</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Plants &amp; Engineering Manager</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Decatur Utilities</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">(256) 301-4605Office</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">(256) 654-1630 Cell</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">(256) 552-1484 Fax</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><a href="mailto:tcleveland@decaturutilities.com">tcleveland@decaturutilities.com</a></font></p>
<p> </p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Safety for lone workers</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=9043</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 5638 Views<br />Started by Tom Stow<br />Last Posted to on Monday, January 10, 2011 11:18:42 AM by Anonymous<br /><root><p>When we are on shift alone we have to call the Answering service every two hrs.(we have 15 min.before the hr. to 15 min. after the hr. a half hr. span). If we forget to make a call the answering service tries to get a hold of us by using phone and two way, if there is no answere by us they call the Supervisor on call who will try calling then if there is no response somebody is sent out to check on us either the Supervisor or somebody on O.T. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>D.Mak</p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:18:42 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>asset management software</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8735</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 7390 Views<br />Started by Donald Tucker<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, November 02, 2010 2:34:23 PM by Donald Tucker<br /><root><p>I am considering switching from a CMMS type software to one that also incorperates asset management and capital planning.  Does anyone have experience with this type of software and has it been helpful in capital planning?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thank You</p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 19:34:23 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Biological Phosphorous Removal - Anaerobic Digestion</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=7137</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 9858 Views<br />Started by James Royer<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, May 04, 2010 3:33:51 PM by James Royer<br /><root><p>I read an article about the Biosolids Management at the Charlotte-Meckenburg McAlpine Creek WWTP recently. This 64 MGD plant utilizes biological P removal and then anaerobically digests the solids to make a class B biosolid for land application.</p>
<p>Their discharge limit for phosphorous is stated at 1067 lbs/day on a monthy average which would be a 2.0 mg/L P in the effluent. It would appear that their bio P removal is mostly a waste of treatment effort. I do not know what their influent P levels are but even without P removal treatment 40% would be removed just with activated sludge.</p>
<p>I would hope that they are looking into a procedure such as Ostara or some other chemical method to remove the phosphorous from the sludge dewatering centrate so that phosphorous removed during bio P will be kept out of the recycle to the head of the plant. Bio P should result in a discharge of 0.5 mg/L on a routine basis.</p>
<p>I think that Bio P removal and anaerobic digestion should have chemical sequestering of the P in the recycle stream as a requirement. This would help reduce phosphorous entering our waterways.</p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 20:33:51 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
