<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <!-- Generated by Ektron CMS400.NET -->
 <channel>
  <title>WEF Discussion Forums : Collection Systems</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=topics&amp;f=544&amp;groupid=-1</link>
  <description>Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs), Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs)</description>
 <item>
  <title>Chemical Grouting Sewer Joints &amp; Laterals</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935266</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 1365 Views<br />Started by 01673195<br />Last Posted to on Wednesday, April 03, 2013 1:56:35 PM by 01673195<br />Looking to hear from any Utility's using grouting to control I&amp;I.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:56:35 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Collapsed Sewer Lines</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935263</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 1626 Views<br />Started by handymanlondon<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, February 28, 2013 1:30:38 PM by 01667942<br />The most common reason for Collapsed sewer lines that i see is sloppy construction and poor choice of materials for the conditions.  If you have both thin pipe and high speed backfilling with the excavated dirt, rocks and debris you will destroy the pipe quickly.  There is also the damage from other utilities.  Directional boring, power pole anchors and grounding rods, etc.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 19:30:38 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Sewer Exfiltration</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8589935212</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 3558 Views<br />Started by 01661580<br />Last Posted to on Wednesday, September 05, 2012 12:45:16 PM by 01661580<br />Has anyone had to address any issues with sewer exfiltration? Have you heard anything from your local regulatory community on exfiltrating sewers?
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:45:16 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>How will our Sani/SWM services change by 2050?</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451202</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 4345 Views<br />Started by Stephen Lampert<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, December 08, 2011 6:38:47 PM by Stephen Lampert<br /><p> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font> </p>
<p> My City Manager<font face="Calibri">has recently asked how Sani/SWM services will change by 2050. I could really use some f<span>uturistic</span> ideas/predictions from the forum. I need to answer him by the end of day Friday, December 9. Thanks for any help on this.</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Steve </font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri">“What will City services look like in 2050?  Specifically, how will the services your department provides change by 2050?”</font> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri">As specialists in your field, what trends, technologies, or service requirements do you foresee as emerging or necessary.</font> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Please reply with any ideas that you would like included by end-of-day Friday, December 9th.  Your input will likely affect future decisions on how the City is run or how this department may conduct its business.</font> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Thank you for your participation.</font> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Regards,</font> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Tom </font> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:38:47 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>I&amp;I</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8975</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 7450 Views<br />Started by T.O.C.<br />Last Posted to on Monday, December 05, 2011 12:13:26 PM by Peter McCarthy<br /><p>One of our municipal customers is questioning our wastewater flow metering by showing lack of correlation with municipal water usage. The community has high water tables and, up to 5 years ago, no connection inspection program. In the past, I have not seen good correlation between municipal water usage and wastewater flows, even with tight collection systems. Does anyone know of studies or have experience in correlating these two data sources?</p>
<p>Pete McCarthy</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:13:26 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Mercury Control - Pretreatment</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=6442451006</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 3158 Views<br />Started by Jason Graham<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, November 29, 2011 2:07:35 PM by Jason Graham<br /><p>Hi Everyone,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I am trying to learn more about programs used by other utilities to help control mercury from a pretreatment standpoint.  For example, does your entity have the following programs in place?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>1)  Amalgam separator program with local dentists?  Inspection process?</p>
<p>2)  Programs for photo finishers to remove Hg prior to the collection system?  Inspection process?</p>
<p>3)  Program that investigates and identifies all potential and real sources of Hg from all non-domestic sources including schools?  Inspection process?</p>
<p>4)  Other programs or lessons learned?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thank You!</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:07:35 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Flextran fiberglass pipe</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=11547</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 3473 Views<br />Started by James Crooks<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, November 10, 2011 6:40:49 AM by James Crooks<br /><p>Does anyone have experience with Flextran pipe.  We have 11,000 feet of 42 inch interceptor and I am trying to get a history of other people's experience with this product.</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:40:49 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Pump &amp; Equipment Replacement Program</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=9072</link>
  <description><![CDATA[2 Replies, 7298 Views<br />Started by Dennis Hudson<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 6:23:08 PM by Dean Falkner<br /><root><p>There are a few thoughts to consider:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The original Clean Water Resolving Program dictated the need for an equipment replacement program.  It's good business.  Have money built over time to replace old and aging equipment.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Some engineers were creative and actually built the perfect plant.  However, some equipment really represented a misapplication of equipment.  Before fixing anything, it's always good to review the performance and maintenance history to make sure it's the right equipment.  If it's not, why dump money into a looser.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Actually, we expanded our equipment replacement fund to also include a sewer jetter.  By doing so, we actually collect revenue toward replacement from all of the departments using it....water department, for valve box and stop box repair plus hydrant cleaning and vacuum of paint debris.....DPW for digging holes to plant trees...wastewater for sewer jetting and other applications.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Personally, I have a real issue always borrowing for routine and ongoing expenses.  In my current position...we have a debt service requirement of about $750,000 and our actual O&amp;M budget is a similar amount.  Our current rates would have been 1/2 of the current rate had folks made minor rate increases instead of borrowing against our kids and grand-kids.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Yep...I'm an old guy....</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Dean Falkner</p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:23:08 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Cleaning force mains</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=10786</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 3240 Views<br />Started by Robert Ooten<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 6:13:00 PM by Dean Falkner<br /><root><p>Hi Bob:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We've used a pig to help on water main problems, but not a force main.  It worked, but we needed to create a pig entry point that was easy to access the main....valves were essential.  The foam pigs provide great options.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A challenge I have seen is that we use VFD's to control pump cycling.  In doing so, we ignore the minimum velocities of the force main.  Perhaps at night time, it's worth allowing the wet well to build-up...then use multiple pumps to create a scouring velocity.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Just a few thougths.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Dean Falkner</p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Clogging Pump Impellers - Wastewater Collection System</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=10741</link>
  <description><![CDATA[3 Replies, 4363 Views<br />Started by Frederick Auermuller<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 6:07:43 PM by Dean Falkner<br /><root><p> <font size="2" face="Arial"> </font> </p>
<div>Fred:</div><div> </div><div>An idea for your hip pocket is if you can identify an alternative pump that would be able to handle this kind of flow.  For instance, we had originally spec'd Vaugn chopper pumps.  We accepted an alternative.  We raised the concern that the Vaugn would have worked.  The alternative pump manufacturer bent over backwards to get their pumps to work.</div><div> </div><div>Another issue can actually be the pump suction.  Vaughn wanted a larger diameter suction piping than te alternate required.  The larger diameter suction eases flow and reduces NSP to get better flow.</div><div> </div><div>Good luck and I'd love to hear your ultimate solution!!!!!!!!!!!!!</div><div> </div><div>Dean<br /><br /></div><p> </p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:07:43 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Customer Response to Sluggish Plumbing</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=10614</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 11230 Views<br />Started by Doug<br />Last Posted to on Friday, July 08, 2011 7:43:14 AM by 01834967<br /><p>Our utility sends out a crew to check the sewer main and the property line cleanout if there is one available.<span>  </span> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>We provide this service even after hours if the customer contacts our emergency number.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:43:14 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Poll Question, do your jetter ops wear hard hats?</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8221</link>
  <description><![CDATA[2 Replies, 9322 Views<br />Started by Moline Mark<br />Last Posted to on Friday, July 01, 2011 3:43:29 PM by 01834967<br />Our operators are required to have on a hard hat and traffic vest anytime they are on a jobsite.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 20:43:29 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Pieburting of asbestos/cement pipe</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=10607</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 3474 Views<br />Started by Leonard Blanchette<br />Last Posted to on Friday, July 01, 2011 3:41:50 PM by Leonard Blanchette<br /><root><p>can anyone provide the current view of EPA regarding pipebursting of asbestos/cement pipe. I am aware of its 1990 (1991?) stand. Thanks.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Leonard Blanchette</p>
<p>Brunswick Sewer District</p>
<p><a href="mailto:lblanchette@brunswicksewer.org">lblanchette@brunswicksewer.org</a></p></root>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 20:41:50 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Any reported problems with plastic gravity sewer mains?</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8808</link>
  <description><![CDATA[6 Replies, 7961 Views<br />Started by Mark Orey<br />Last Posted to on Wednesday, June 29, 2011 6:38:47 AM by Anonymous<br />Fianlly! This is just what I was looking for.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:38:47 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The use of Flow Control Vavles on Sewage Force Mains</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=9958</link>
  <description><![CDATA[7 Replies, 7313 Views<br />Started by Andrew Platt<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, June 28, 2011 4:46:14 AM by Anonymous<br />You keep it up now, unedrastnd? Really good to know.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:46:14 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Vaccum Sewers: Flovac vs Airvac</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=9865</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 6403 Views<br />Started by Alberto Lazaro<br />Last Posted to on Sunday, June 26, 2011 3:35:32 PM by Anonymous<br />Check that off the list of tgihns I was confused about.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 20:35:32 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Large EQ tanks at point-of-discharge</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=10412</link>
  <description><![CDATA[0 Replies, 5516 Views<br />Started by Robin<br />Last Posted to on Tuesday, June 07, 2011 7:59:45 PM by 01667942<br />I am aware of a prison that has an onsite EQ basin with about 18 hours of hydraulic detention time.  There are several problems.  The first is odors, they exchange the media in the exhaust air scrubber so frequently the cost is now a barrier.  The corrosion inside the covered EQ basin (CROM) will soon destroy the tank.  The tank includes a internal prop type mixer and two mixing aspirators.  The aspirator air lines were extended through the roof to allow external air to be used as an attempt to improve odors.  The recieving POTW has odor problems.  The mixers are truned off in low flow times to prevent soap suds building up and causing "high water" alarms.  There is discussion of building a new lift station and bypassing the tank unless there is need for the storage.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:59:45 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Boil Out, Deep fat fryer cleaner</title>
  <link>http://www.wef.org/OnlineEducation/page_forum.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=8989</link>
  <description><![CDATA[3 Replies, 8189 Views<br />Started by Brett Ward<br />Last Posted to on Thursday, December 16, 2010 8:54:44 AM by James Royer<br /><p>If they store it in a barrel I hope they have their grease trap pumped prior to discharge of the whole barrelful of solution. If not then they would probably dissolve the collected grease and emulsify it into the sewer line. At some point downstream it might solidify and cause a blockage the same as if too hot water is discharged thru the greasetrap.</p>
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:54:44 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
