Water Environment Federation (WEF) Discussion Forums
Home      Members   Calendar   Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      

Home » WEF Discussion Forums » Biological Nutrient Removal » Effect of ferric chloride on Bio P removal


Effect of ferric chloride on Bio P removalExpand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 2/18/2008 8:53:25 AM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/13/2008 9:54:56 AM
Posts: 1, Visits: 7
Does anyone have experience or knowledge on the effects of ferric chloride addition on the biological removal of phospahtes from a BNR system. Will addition of a metal salt inhibit the functioning of PAOs in any way?

Dave

dave - za

Post #8410
Posted 2/18/2008 2:57:09 PM


Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 6:54:35 PM
Posts: 235, Visits: 617
We add alum to the secondary clarifier influent if we get above 0.5 mg/l O-PO4.  We then take grabs daily of the aerator effluent before the alum addition to see how the EBPR is doing.  When it gets back below 0.5 we shut off the alum to that train.  There is a 'flywheel" effect in that it takes a while for the alum to have an effect and it continues to have an effect for a while after shutting it off since the RAS brings it back to the aerator.  You would probably see a lower release since the alum will be grabbing some P in the anaerobic zone but that should not effect the important P uptake in the aerobic zones.  Of course you can over dose.....
Post #8414
Posted 2/18/2008 4:03:02 PM
Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 5:26:38 PM
Posts: 210, Visits: 628
Dave,

Ferric chloride is very efficient at P removal  and is commonly done as a standalone process or in conjunction with BIO P. Like all chemical treatment processes it will add sludge to the system , the amount varies by where the addition point is in the process. There has been significant discussions recently elsewhere in this forum if you want check them out.

The impact on BIO-P uptake is also affected by the dosing position and by the dose rates.

Theoretically the two can work together particularly if the dose point is after the aeration tank and the dose is kept low. However if ferric is being dosed to meet discharge standards there will always be the likelihood of overdosing.

Think of this scenario.

Your plant has a bad day for BIO-P. Perhaps you have had some breakdowns or something that has resulted in a low BIO -P uptake so your effluent results are higher than you would like. Knowing that the BIO-P may take a couple of days to stabilize you increase your chem dose to get the effluent back where you want. After a couple of days things are going well so you decide to cut back the ferric. The effluent P will immediately climb because the BIO-P requires some time to re-adjust to the conditions. So you go back to where you were.  A bit further down the track you have another problem and you have to increase the ferric dosing , and so the cycle continues.

If you are not careful you will end up doing 100% chemical P removal and i have seen this happen at a number of plants that were suppossedly doing chemical polishing after a BIO P process.

Regards

TerryF

Post #8421
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »


Reading This TopicExpand / Collapse
Active Users: 1 (1 guest, 0 members, 0 anonymous members)
No members currently viewing this topic.

PermissionsExpand / Collapse

All times are GMT -5:00, Time now is 11:58pm

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.0.0 © 2008
Execution: 0.109. 10 queries. Compression Enabled.